CHIEF AYENI & ORS V. JOSEPH DADA & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF AYENI & ORS V. JOSEPH DADA & ORS

PETER IGHO V. THE STATE
August 4, 2025
ABDUL HAMID OJO V. PRIMATE E.O. ADEJOBI & ORS
August 4, 2025
PETER IGHO V. THE STATE
August 4, 2025
ABDUL HAMID OJO V. PRIMATE E.O. ADEJOBI & ORS
August 4, 2025
Show all

CHIEF AYENI & ORS V. JOSEPH DADA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-03) Legalpedia (SC) 21116

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 10, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 235/1975

CORAM


UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT NNAEMEKA-AGU WALI KUTIGI OGWUEGBU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, SUPRE

UDOMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAI-WILLIAMS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT,


PARTIES


CHIEF AYENI & ORS (Odofin of Ikoro)

APPELLANTS 


HIS HIGHNESS JOSEPH DADA & ORS (The Olojaoke of Okemesi)

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ADMISSIBLITY OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- APPEAL

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The court of appeal ordered a retrial of the matter on the grounds that the documents relied on by the trial court in giving its judgment were inadmissible. The trial court had relied on Exhibits F and G and other evidence which were made by public servants in their official capacity and which related to the issue of the boundary of the land in dispute.

 


HELD


The court allowed the appeal and restored the decision of the trial court.

 


ISSUES


Whether the lower court was right in holding that Exhibits F and G were inadmissible and ordering a retrial.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ADMISSIBILITY DOCUMENTS CERTIFIED BY AN OFFICER OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES


A document certified by an officer of the National Archives and authenticated by the official seal of the Director of Federal Archives is admissible in evidence- Fatayi- Williams J.S.C

 


ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENTS MADE BY PUBLIC SERVANTS IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY


Documents made by public servants in the course of their official duties at a time when no litigation was pending are relevant and admissible- Fatayi- Williams J.S.C

 


ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENT ADMISSIBLE UNDER A WRITTEN LAW BUT ADMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ANOTHER WRITTEN LAW


if a document, (tendered in evidence in a civil case and admitted without objection), is clearly admissible under the provisions of a particular written law but is admitted by a trial Judge wrongly under the provisions of another written law, it will be grossly unjust for a Court of Appeal to hold, in an appeal against the judgment of the lower court which admitted the document, that the document has been wrongly admitted and to allow the appeal on that ground- Fatayi- Williams J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Onyeanwusi v. Okpakpara 14 WACA 311

Thanni v. Saibu (1977) 2 S.C. 89

Okeke v. Obidife (1965) NMLR 113

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence Act

National Archives Act

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.