Just Decided Cases

C.A. BANJO & ORS VS ETERNAL SACRED ORDER OF CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM

Legalpedia Citation: (1975) Legalpedia (SC) 01111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 13, 1975

Suit Number: SC. 245/1974

CORAM


YEKINI OLAYIWOLA ADIO (Read the Leading Judgment), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


C.A. BANJO & ORS APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondents to this appeal were the plaintiffs in an action instituted by that company in the High Court, Lagos, against the appellants as defendants in that court. The plaintiffs writ is endorsed as follows:-

The plaintiffs claim against the defendants jointly and severally:-

(i) a declaration that the registered Memorandum and Articles of Association of the plaintiffs as registered on the date of incorporation has never been validly amended;

(ii) a declaration that the defendants are no longer members of the Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim; and

(iii) an injunction restraining the defendants, their servants and agents from claiming to be members of or interfering with the properties (real and personal) of the plaintiffs or attending any of the plaintiffs churches for purpose of worship without the permission of the Baba Aladura for the time being.


HELD


The appeal failed and was dismissed.


ISSUES


Whether the trial Court Judge was right in considering the application.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS


The term “abuse of the process of the court” connotes that the process of the court must be used only bona fide and not improperly as a means of vexation and oppression.-Per George B. A. Coker, JSC


EXERCISE OF POWER TO SET ASIDE OR STAY PROCEEDINGS ON THE GROUND OF “ABUSE OF THE PROCESS OF THE COURT”


The power to set aside or stay proceedings on the ground of “abuse of the process of the court” would only be exercised with great circumspection and judicial discretion and would not be exercised where the grounds for the stay or striking out is being sought or where the sting of the complaint could not be discovered unless and until it is elicited by evidence- Per
George B. A. Coker, JSC


ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS


where the matters upon which the complaint is founded or rather where the complaint of a defendant cannot be deciphered until evidence is settled on that count, that Rule could not be successfully invoked. -Per George B. A. Coker, JSC


CASES CITED


Selangor United Rubber Estates Limited v. Cradock & Ors. No. 4 (1969) 1 WLR 1773

the Privy Council in Electrical Development Co. of Ontario v. Attorney-General for Ontario and Anor. (1919) A.C. 68


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago