Just Decided Cases

BRITISH INDIA GENERAL INSURANCE CO (NIG) LTD V. A. THAWARDAS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-03) Legalpedia (SC) 11111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 31, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 320/1976

CORAM


ALEXANDER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


THE BRITISH INDIA GENERAL INSURANCE CO (NIGERIA) LTD

APPELLANTS 


A. THAWARDAS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


INSURANCE LAW /DAMAGES – CARRIAGE OF GOODS

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff a merchant insured 165 cases of sardines shipped from Las Palmas against all risk with the Defendant (an Insurance Company) upon arrival of the ship at Lagos port, his goods was not found, he reported to all authorities concerned including the Defendant who promised to settled his claim but failed to so do.

 


HELD


The Court held that the learned trial Judge was fully justified to have found and said as he did –

“I am satisfied upon the evidence before the court that the consignment of 165 cases of sardines insured for £1225 under the Certificate of Insurance (Exhibit D) issued by the Defendant company have not been delivered to the insured and non delivery of the goods was one of the risks covered by the policy of insurance Exhibit C also issued by the Defendant company.”

We therefore see no substance in this appeal and we hereby dismiss it with costs to the respondent assessed at N140.00.

 


ISSUES


Whether an insurable interest exist.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE


“It is of course the duty of counsel to object to inadmissible evidence and the duty of the trial court any way to refuse to admit inadmissible evidence, but if not withstanding this evidence is still through oversight or otherwise admitted then it is the duty of the court when it comes to give judgment to treat the inadmissible evidence as if it had never been admitted.” Per Obaseki J.S.C.

 


CONTRACT OF INSURANCE


“In the absence of any provision to the contrary, express or implied, every contract of insurance is presumed to be made subject to proof of such interest as the law requires.” Per Obaseki J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED


National Investment and Property Co. Ltd. v. Thompson Organization Ltd. & 2 Ors (1969) 1 All NLR 138 at 142;

Aniemeka Emegokwe v. James Okadigbo (1973) 4 S.C. 113 at 117.

Chief Okparaoke etc. v. Obidike Egbuonu & Ors (1941) 7 WACA 53 at 55

Macauva v. Northern Assurance Company (1925) AC 619 at 631

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Marine Insurance Act, 19

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

THE “PROOF-READY” LAWYER: 2026 EVIDENCE PRESERVATION CHECKLIST

A Practice Guide for Litigation, Corporate, and IP/Tech Departments OVERVIEW Under the current Nigerian legal…

1 week ago

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago