BERNARD OKOEBOR V. POLICE COUNCIL & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

BERNARD OKOEBOR V. POLICE COUNCIL & ORS

ALHAJI USMAN BUA VS. BASHIRU DAUDA
June 16, 2025
TRADE BANK PLC V BENILUX (NIG.) LTD
June 16, 2025
ALHAJI USMAN BUA VS. BASHIRU DAUDA
June 16, 2025
TRADE BANK PLC V BENILUX (NIG.) LTD
June 16, 2025
Show all

BERNARD OKOEBOR V. POLICE COUNCIL & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2003) Legalpedia (SC) 13127

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 2, 2003

Suit Number: SC.33/1999

CORAM


AUGUSTINE NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


BERNARD OKOEBOR APPELLANT(S) / PLAINTIFF(S)


DEFENDANT(S) /RESPONDENT(S)


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was indicted by Deputy Superintendent of Police, A Kalu for leaving his duty post where he was assigned and for receiving a bribe of N3.00. Mr A. Kalu immediately punished the appellant with hard labour which involved leveling of a vast expanse of grassland.


HELD


Appeal allowed


ISSUES


1. Whether the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in law when they held that they entirely agreed with the Learned Trial Judge that the plaintiff failed to prove his claim and therefore not entitled to judgment.
2. Whether the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in law when they failed to make any pronouncement on the issue of an orderly room Panel trying an allegation of receiving N3.00 (three naira) bribe which said allegation amounts to a criminal offence.
3. Whether the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal did not misdirect themselves in law when they held that Police regulations which is (sic) embodied in the statutes ought to have been pleaded and evidence given on same.
4. Whether the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in Law when they failed to make pronouncement on the trial Court’s failure to receive address from counsel.
5. Whether the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in law in not ordering a non-suit having regard to the circumstances of this case. “


RATIONES DECIDENDI


AVERMENT IN PLEADINGS


In similar vein, the law of pleadings does not require pleading a principle of the common law, but the law requires pleading of customary law because by our law of evidence, customary law is a fact which must be pleaded and proved. Per Niki Tobi J.S.C.


FAILURE TO FILE DEFENCE


The basic principle of law is that where a defendant fails to file a defence, he will be deemed to have admitted the claim or relief in the statement of claim. Per Niki Tobi J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Awoyegbe V. Ogbeide (1988) 1 NWLR (Pt. 73) 695
Aguocha V. Aguocha (1986) 4 NWLR (Pt. 37) 566
Ugo V. Obiekwe (1989) 1 NWLR (Pt. 99) 566


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Police Act, Cap.359 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.