Just Decided Cases

ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION V A.I.C. LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 11070

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 2, 2000

Suit Number: SC. 185 / 1994

CORAM


JAMES OGENYI OGEBE, JSC (Lead Judgment) JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JUSTICE, SPREME COURT

FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ADOLPHOUS G. KARIBI-WHYTE JUSTICE , SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR B. WALI JUSTICE , SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The trial High ordered the appellant, in default of pleadings, to pay to the respondent money, the dispute in which the Ministry of Defence was not a party. The appellant had claimed the sum against other defendants in the suit. The claim against the appellant was injunction restraining payment to the 1st defendant.  ?


HELD


The court allowed the appeal.


ISSUES


1. “Whether it was proper to award a relief not claimed” 2. Whether in a claim based upon a contract, a person who is not a party to the contract could be adjudged liable upon a breach of the said contract.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


A CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER CANNOT BE MADE AGAINST A PERSON WHO WAS NOT A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS


“A consequential order could only be made directing a party who participated in the proceeding before the court and was involved in the judgment to do certain things. You cannot make consequential order directing a complete stranger do the proceedings and judgment to pay money in satisfaction with the enforcement of a judgment. If such an order is to be made the party being directed to comply with it must be given notice of it so as to have the opportunity to oppose it.” – Mohammed J.S.C


THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT OBTAIN A RELIEF WHICH HE DID NOT EXPRESSLY CLAIM IN THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM WHEN THE DEFENDANT DEFAULTS IN GIVING NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND


“where a defendant in a suit defaults in giving notice of intention to defend, or in a pleading or does not appear at the trial, the plaintiff cannot obtain a relief which he did not expressly claim in the Statement of Claim.”- Mohammed J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Tocan v. National Standard Investment Co. (1887) 56 L.T. 165 Faithful v. Woodley (1890) 43 Ch.D.287 Etim Ekpenyong and Ors. v. Inyang Effong Nyong and 6 Others (1975) 2 S.C. 7


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

HILARY FORMS LIMITED & ORS V. M.V. MAHTRA (SISTER VESSEL TO M.V. KADRINA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (CA) 87771 In the Court of Appeal HOLDEN AT LAGOS Wed…

16 minutes ago

EASTERN BREWRIES PLC & ANOR VS. GEORGE MICHAEL INUEN

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (CA) 17139 In the Court of Appeal Thu Dec 2, 1999…

10 hours ago

CHIEF EDET BROWN & 5 ORS VS CHIEF PAUL EDET BASSEY & 4 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (CA) 81986 In the Court of Appeal Thu Dec 2, 1999…

10 hours ago

MR. OLADITI ADESOLA VS RAIMI ABIDOYE & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1999-12) Legalpedia 75381 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

10 hours ago

SAEBY JERNSTOBERI MASKINFABRIC A/S V OLAOGUN ENTERPRISES LTD.

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (SC) 14488 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Dec 3,…

10 hours ago

SALIHU OKINO VS YAKUBU OBANEBIRA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (SC) 51871 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Dec 3,…

10 hours ago