ALHERI GARBA ZIRA vs. ELISHA VANDU - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHERI GARBA ZIRA vs. ELISHA VANDU

BOLA DANSALLA vs. MUSA NAKEWA
April 16, 2025
BUBA YANGARI VS. YERIMA ABISHAI SALEH
April 16, 2025
BOLA DANSALLA vs. MUSA NAKEWA
April 16, 2025
BUBA YANGARI VS. YERIMA ABISHAI SALEH
April 16, 2025
Show all

ALHERI GARBA ZIRA vs. ELISHA VANDU

Legalpedia Citation: (2017) Legalpedia (CA) 21657

In the Court of Appeal

HOLDEN AT YOLA

Fri Mar 24, 2017

Suit Number: CA/YL/136/2015

CORAM


ALEXANDER, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA


PARTIES


ALHERI GARBA ZIRA                  VALEM GARBA ZIRA  APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiffs now Respondents instituted an action by a writ of summons before the High Court of Justice, Adamawa State, against the Defendants now Appellants seeking a declaration that the action of the Defendants of continual farming on the Plaintiffs’ land after demand on the Defendants’ by the Plaintiffs to stop amounted to trespass of the Plaintiffs’ land lying and being situate at Garu Pullu, Jigalambu Ward of Michika Local Government Area, Adamawa State, an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants, their servants, heirs and agents from further farming or building on the Plaintiffs’ land lying and being situate at Garu Pullu, Jigalambu Ward of Michika Local Government Area, Adamawa State, the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Naira (N500,000.00) only being damages for trespass on the Plaintiffs’ land and the cost of the action. At the conclusion of the trial, the court entered judgement in favour of the Respondents. Aggrieved by the trial court’s judgement, the Appellants have lodged the instant appeal before this court contending that the trial court erred in granting the reliefs in favour of the Plaintiffs/Respondents when the land is not certain in location and size and Plaintiffs did not establish exclusive possession of the disputed land.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


Whether the Respondents discharged the onus of proof on them so as to have the judgment of the trial Court in their favour?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act, 2011


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.