SALE DAGAYYA V THE STATE
June 6, 2025MISS IFEYINWA OGOEJEOFO VS DANIEL CHIEJINA OGOEJEOFO
June 6, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (2006) Legalpedia (SC) 76101
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Fri Jan 13, 2006
Suit Number: SC. 143/2001
CORAM
PARTIES
1. ALHAJI ISIYAKU YAKUBU ENTERPRISES LTD2. ALHAJI ISIYAKU YAKUBU APPELLANTS
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The Plaintiffs had in the High Court obtained judgment against the Defendants which states that the Defendants shall pay damages to the Plaintiffs. There was no appeal against the judgment. The Defendants promptly paid the sum awarded to the Plaintiffs who objected and insisted that the amount awarded as damages was more than the amount paid as per their writ of summons. In furtherance of their claim the Plaintiffs attached some of the Defendants’ properties by virtue of a writ of execution issued by the same court. In a reaction, the Defendants filed a motion praying the court to set aside the writ of attachment and the execution. The Plaintiffs opposed. The learned trial Judge granted the prayers of the Defendants and re-affirmed his earlier judgment that he only awarded the Plaintiffs N5,000 (five thousand naira) as damages and not N5,000,000 (five million naira) as claimed by the Plaintiffs. The plaintiff aggrieved by the above Ruling, appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and, a further appeal was lodged in the Supreme Court.
HELD
The appeal was dismissed.
ISSUES
What was the actual amount of damages awarded by the trial High Court to the Plaintiffs? Was is N5,000,000 (five million naira) or N5,000 (five thousand naira) as stated and confirmed by the trial judge himself? ?
RATIONES DECIDENDI
CASES CITED
None
STATUTES REFERRED TO
None

