ALHAJI AUDU BIDA VS COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHAJI AUDU BIDA VS COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE

JAMES FAKOREDE & ORS VS ATTORNEY-GENERAL WESTERN STATE
August 23, 2025
GEORGE C. ASHIBUOGWU VS ATTORNEY GENERAL BENDEL STATE AND ANOR
August 23, 2025
JAMES FAKOREDE & ORS VS ATTORNEY-GENERAL WESTERN STATE
August 23, 2025
GEORGE C. ASHIBUOGWU VS ATTORNEY GENERAL BENDEL STATE AND ANOR
August 23, 2025
Show all

ALHAJI AUDU BIDA VS COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE

Legalpedia Citation: (2022-04) Legalpedia 63302 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Abuja

Fri Mar 10, 1972

Suit Number: SC 160/71

CORAM


COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDOMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAI-WILLIAMS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ALHAJI AUDU BIDA

APPELLANTS 


COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FAIR HEARING-DENIAL OF FAIRHEARING

PERSONAL INCOME TAX- SERVICE OF ASSESSMENT NOTICE.

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff/Respondent sued the Defendant/Appellant for the sum of # 24,217. 15s. Being arrears of personal tax, notices had been sent to the defendant but the defendant complained of none service of tax assessment. His appeal was dismissed.

 


HELD


The court held that the onus rested on the defendant to prove that he was not properly served and having chosen not to do so the certificate stood unrebutted and the appeal was dismissed.

 


ISSUES


(i) Whether S.43 (3) of the personal Income tax law is inconsistent with the provisions of S.22 (1) of the constitution.

(ii) Whether S.43 (3) is personal income tax law on the production of a certificate signed by any person duly authorized by the commissioner shall be sufficient evidence of the amount so due.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STATUS OF A DOCUMENT WHICH THE PARLIAMENT MAKES PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF A FACT


“Where an act of Parliament makes a document primia facie evidence of a fact, those who say it is not a fact at least must prove most clearly the negative”- per Levis JSC

 


CASES CITED


(1) Ystalyfera Iron Co vs. Neata and Brecon Railway Co. (1873) LR 17 EQ 142.

(2) Barraclough vs. Greenhough (1867) LR 2 CLB 612 Board of  Trade vs. Sailing Slip Glenpark (1904) 1KB 682

(3) Lewis vs. Leonard (1880) LR 5Ex D 1.65

(4) Board of Inland revenue vs. Joseph Rez callah & Sons Ltd (1962) 1 ALL NLR 2

(5) Ilorin native authority vs. Ajao 1967 NWLR 80 etc.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


(i) Personal Tax Law

(ii) Constitution of Nigeria

(iii) Merchant Shipping Act

(iv) Income tax Ordinance 1948.

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.