AGNES DEBORAH EJIOFODOMI V H.C. OKONKWO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

AGNES DEBORAH EJIOFODOMI V H.C. OKONKWO

FAWZI MOUKARIM AND ANOR V MRS ALIRAT ABENI AGBAJE & ANOR
July 24, 2025
O. SOLOMON & ORS. V A.R. MOGAJI & ORS
July 24, 2025
FAWZI MOUKARIM AND ANOR V MRS ALIRAT ABENI AGBAJE & ANOR
July 24, 2025
O. SOLOMON & ORS. V A.R. MOGAJI & ORS
July 24, 2025
Show all

AGNES DEBORAH EJIOFODOMI V H.C. OKONKWO

Legalpedia Citation: (1982) Legalpedia (SC) 67141

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Nov 12, 1982

Suit Number: SC. 90/1981

CORAM


SOWEMIMO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.B WALI – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ESO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


AGNES DEBORAH EJIOFODOMI APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

In the District Court of Kano State, the plaintiff/respondent (H. C. Okonkwo hereinafter referred to as the respondent) took out a writ of summons against the defendant/appellant (Agnes Deborah Ejiofodomi also hereinafter referred to as the appellant.


HELD


APPEAL ALLOWED


ISSUES


None.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


Rule of not raising fresh points on appeal


“As a matter of principle the Court of Appeal has always been strict in applying the rule that an appellant from a county court, unless the other party consents, cannot be allowed in this court to raise a new point of law not raised below. After all, the county court is intended to serve litigants of relatively small means. It is not in accordance with the public interest that a party who has fought a case in county court and been defeated should then raise in this court a new point and put his case in an entirely different way as a matter of law and so make the other party, hitherto successful, litigate the matter again at the risk of having to pay the costs not only below, but in this court.” PER M. BELLO, JSC


CASES CITED


None.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.