A.T. KIREN V. PASCAL & LUDWIG INC - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

A.T. KIREN V. PASCAL & LUDWIG INC

EDWARD EGONU & ORS V. MADAM EZIAMAKA EGONU & ORS
August 2, 2025
LASUPO AKANNI & ORS V. ADEDEJI MAKANJU & ORS
August 2, 2025
EDWARD EGONU & ORS V. MADAM EZIAMAKA EGONU & ORS
August 2, 2025
LASUPO AKANNI & ORS V. ADEDEJI MAKANJU & ORS
August 2, 2025
Show all

A.T. KIREN V. PASCAL & LUDWIG INC

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-11) Legalpedia (SC) 41111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Nov 24, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 384/1975

CORAM


ALEXANDER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


A.T. KIREN

APPELLANTS 


PASCAL & LUDWIG INC

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


PROCEDURAL LAW- JURISDICTION

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff (appellant) claimed against the defendant (respondent) the sum of £16,000 (N32,000) for unlawful dismissal of the plaintiff from the employment of the defendant.

 


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the right of appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court and the conditions under which the Supreme Court could exercise its undoubted jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from the Court of Appeal, were provided for in Section 34 of the Court of Appeal Edict, 1967, read together with Section 117 of the Constitution of the Federation and Section 53 of the Constitution of the former Western Nigeria.

 


ISSUES


Whether or not leave of the Court of Appeal was required to enable the defendant/respondent to appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision (or decisions) of the Court of Appeal

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHT OF APPEAL


“When compared with Section 34 of the Court of Appeal Edict 1967, it becomes clear that while in Section 98 (6) of Cap. 181 no reference is made to appeals “with or without leave”, Section 34 of the Edict takes full congnizance of circumstances in which a right of appeal may be exercised “with or without leave” to the Court of Appeal in the first instance and similarly to the Supreme Court, in accordance with the existing law relating thereto, with the necessary modifications.” Per ALEXANDER, CJN

 


CASES CITED


University of Ibadan v. Adamolekun (1967) 1 All NLR 213

Amudipe v. Arijodi (S.C.381/75)

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

The Court of Appeal Edict, 1967

The Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree 1966

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.