Just Decided Cases

A. I. EGBUNIKE & ANOR VS AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1995) Legalpedia (SC) 01371

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 3, 1995

Suit Number: S.C. 253/1989.

CORAM


BELLO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M.E. OGUNDARE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

Y.O. ADIO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


A. I. EGBUNIKEMARIA GOLD OBIAGELI EGBUNIKE(Trading as Metropolitan Paints and Chemicals Co.) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Respondent’s claim against the appellants, jointly and severally as follows:- (i) the sum of N800,312.28 being balance of overdraft with compound interest at the rate of 10% per annum as at close of business on the 26th November, 1979.(ii) compound interest at the rate of 10% per annum with monthly rests until the debt is fully repaid or judgment is obtained counting from 27th November,1979.


HELD


That the sum of N800,312.28 together with compound interest at the rate of 10% per annum with monthly rests and with effect from 27/11/79 till the debt is fully paid


ISSUES


Whether it was correct in law for the court below to state that the material averments in the respondent’s pleading had all been admitted in the Amended Statement of Defence in this case.Whether, having regards to the fact that the trial in the High Court was conducted on the footing that all the averments in the Amended Statement of Claim had to be proved it was open to the Court of Appeal to have allowed the respondent’s appeal on the ground that there was no need for any witnesses to have been called to testify to the facts already admitted on the pleadings.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


UNCONTRADICTED EVIDENCE-HOW TREATED


Evidence which is unchallenged and uncontradicted, if credible, ought to be accepted as there is nothing on the other side to balance. Per Adio, JCA


PLEADING IS NOT EVIDENCE


it is sufficient to say that pleading cannot constitute evidence and a defendant who does not give or lead evidence in support of the averments in his pleading or in challenge of the evidence of the plaintiff is deemed to have accepted the facts adduced by the plaintiff notwithstanding the general traverse. Per Adio, JCA


CASES CITED


Adejumo v. Ayantegbe, (1989) 3 NWLR. (Part 110) 417Federal Capital Development Authority v. Naibi (1990) 3 N.W.LR. (Part 138) 270Lewis & Peat Ltd. v. Akhimien, (1976) 2 All NLR. (Part 1) 460Obmiami Brick & Stone (Nig.) Ltd., v. African Continental Bank Ltd. [1992] 3 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 229) 260.Mogaji v. Odofin, (1978) 4 SC. 91 at Page 93.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence ActThe Bills of Exchange Act


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

3 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

3 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

3 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 months ago