AUTO IMPORT EXPORT VS J. A. A. ADEBAYO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

AUTO IMPORT EXPORT VS J. A. A. ADEBAYO

HON. JUSTICE K. O. ANYAH (RTD) VS IMO CONCORDE HOTELS LTD.
June 18, 2025
NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY APPELLANT VS MR. B. EDEGBERO & ORS
June 18, 2025
HON. JUSTICE K. O. ANYAH (RTD) VS IMO CONCORDE HOTELS LTD.
June 18, 2025
NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY APPELLANT VS MR. B. EDEGBERO & ORS
June 18, 2025
Show all

AUTO IMPORT EXPORT VS J. A. A. ADEBAYO

Legalpedia Citation: (2002) Legalpedia (SC) 61812

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 13, 2002

Suit Number: SC. 49/1997

CORAM


MOHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SAMSON ODEMWINGIE UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


AUTO IMPORT EXPORT APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant’s appeal was filed two days out of time. The appellant contended that under the practice direction of the Supreme Court, time does not run during vacation and that it application for leave to appeal out of time was granted in chambers.    ?


HELD


AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD. CALABER VS JOSEPH AGBANYM   1960   FSC 267/1959   [1960] NSCC 12The court held that the practice direction applies only to briefs and that the motion under which leave was allegedly granted in chambers was not served on the respondents.  The appeal was struck out.   ?


ISSUES


AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD. CALABER VS JOSEPH AGBANYM   1960   FSC 267/1959   [1960] NSCC 121.  Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain an Appeal filed out of time.2.  Whether the Supreme Court may on ground of want of jurisdiction properly set aside its own order extending time for filing the Notice of Appeal.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


FAILURE TO SERVE HEARING NOTICE


Under our adversary system of jurisprudence, to hear a case without one of the parties having been served with the necessary process except in a proper ex parte proceedings would render the trial a nullity Iguh J.S.C


TIME FOR FILING AN APPEAL DOES NOT CEASE TO RUN DURING VACATION


Neither Practice Directions nor, indeed, Rules of Court can overrule Statutory Provisions. Section 27(2)(a) of the Supreme Court Act, Cap. 424, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990 which makes provision in respect of the periods of time within which to appeal has neither stipulated nor suggested that the time therein prescribed shall cease to run during periods of vacation- Iguh J.S.C


CASES CITED


Azeez Akeredolu and others V. Lasisi Akinremi (1985) 2 N.W.L.R. (Part 10) 787Kudiabor V. Kudanu 6 W.A.C.A. 14Oranye V. Jibowu 1950 13 W.A.C.A. 41. Ohene Moore V. Akesseh Tayee 2 W.A.C.A. 43Skenconsult Nig. Ltd and Another V. Godwin Ukey (1981)1 S.C. 6 at 26. Adeigbe and Another V. Guthrie (1993) 4 S.C.N.J. 1 at 17Salisu Idris Saliyim and ors V. Alhaji Mashi and others (1975) 1 N.M.L.R. 55 at 58.Craig V. Kanssen (1943) K.B. 256?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Supreme Court ActThe 1999 Constitution


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.